nitzua wrote:
i lol’d at ‘windows 5’.
all in all, this pretty basic, but looks fairly usable. props for sharing.
i was going to make a screenshot to showcase how comfy & nice this is, but nothing felt right.. :/
there’s 5 variations, 2 styles (of black) and 3 fonts to choose from (haxrcorp 4088, verdana, cure)
AUG25 | graphical fixes to the shellstyle, minor tweaks elsewhere (no idea how i overlooked these)
nitzua wrote:
i lol’d at ‘windows 5’.
all in all, this pretty basic, but looks fairly usable. props for sharing.
Chris [50] wrote:
I’m thinking of moderating this.
Edit: I said why. There’s not enough detail to merit a high ranking, I’m not being harsh. Content in the screen is good because it actually shows how the window will be displayed. I don’t understand an appeal to this because it’s so bare-bone. I just don’t feel as if there’s anything here. The flat style went out in 2005.
If you want to roll with a flat style, put subtle details in it. Maybe some nice borders or slight gradients. No offense but is that really the scrollbar you chose for this? A 1px black rectangle?
Who says I haven’t used it? I don’t throw around rankings like it’s going out of style.
If you’re going to release a VS, especially of the “flat” style – you really need to put some extra thought in how you’re going to make it stand out. See http://customize.org/xpthemes/34699 for a great example. This was done in 2004 when the old community was banging. Flat and minimal doesn’t mean non detailed and unrefined.
bedroompop wrote:
um, the whole idea of the purposely flat style (which some people like! aka preferences) is to show what the style looks like, not to show off a screenshot.
aren’t you being a little harsh, maybe?
also, what’s with the rating if you likely haven’t tried the visual style?
@Man.I / you don’t have a mean bone in you, do you?! i’m pretty much an amatuer mango ;)
@mangosango / it has to be tidy! ..why do you want xp back when you’re doing wonders with w7? you’re crazy.
@audacious / is it that noticeable? i tried to get that as best as i could, which was annoyingly difficult, but i’m happy with it..
all in all, thanks to those that’ve tried it, or will, and can appreciate it in some form!
mangosango wrote:
I don’t have XP anymore, but I wish I did :)
As nitzua said it looks pretty usable and as usual, everything is very neat and clean – maybe a little too clean for my tastes ;)
audacious wrote:
@chris: damn man, i mean its simple and some parts im not a huge fan of, but i dont think it deserves moderation…
i’m using it atm on my laptop, works well and is very clean and cheerful. that said: the programs/logoff/shutdown buttons, while interesting, are kinda difficult and pixelated, and some of the corners in general seem rough?
fate0000 wrote:
Looks like a pretty basic minimal theme. It reminds me of the old Nano suite. I won’t rate since I can’t use it.
Man.I [90] wrote:
I’m using this in an XP virtual machine, I think it’s pro. Real solid, and goes nicely with some of Mango’s stuff :D
@ Chris, you have to use the VS first before you can make a reasonable admin assessment bro. It may help you when offering bedroompop pointers if you see something that can make a delicious variation.
Besides, it’s not one of those aesthetically bizarre amiga system shots…
nosphere wrote:
haven’t tried it yet, however it does look good, to me it has an area04 feeling in it, surely deserves testing
requestedRerun wrote:
I love your style and it really shows in this
akka wrote:
Great colors, and very much your style. Wish the preview showed a little more.
Log in or register to post comments and rate submissions!