kuma visual style by bedroompop in Visual Styles

|

Kuma_

Artist Notes

i was going to make a screenshot to showcase how comfy & nice this is, but nothing felt right.. :/

there’s 5 variations, 2 styles (of black) and 3 fonts to choose from (haxrcorp 4088, verdana, cure)

AUG25 | graphical fixes to the shellstyle, minor tweaks elsewhere (no idea how i overlooked these)

  • Submitted: 08/24/2010
  • Reviews: 10
  • Views: 1461
  • Downloads: 206
  • Admin Rating: 50.00
  • User Rating: 90.00

Avatar11pf

nitzua wrote:

i lol’d at ‘windows 5’.

all in all, this pretty basic, but looks fairly usable. props for sharing.

204444_145536938846931_100001718762509_295095_4952012_o

Chris [50] wrote:

I’m thinking of moderating this.

Edit: I said why. There’s not enough detail to merit a high ranking, I’m not being harsh. Content in the screen is good because it actually shows how the window will be displayed. I don’t understand an appeal to this because it’s so bare-bone. I just don’t feel as if there’s anything here. The flat style went out in 2005.

If you want to roll with a flat style, put subtle details in it. Maybe some nice borders or slight gradients. No offense but is that really the scrollbar you chose for this? A 1px black rectangle?

Who says I haven’t used it? I don’t throw around rankings like it’s going out of style.

If you’re going to release a VS, especially of the “flat” style – you really need to put some extra thought in how you’re going to make it stand out. See http://customize.org/xpthemes/34699 for a great example. This was done in 2004 when the old community was banging. Flat and minimal doesn’t mean non detailed and unrefined.

Panda!!

bedroompop wrote:

um, the whole idea of the purposely flat style (which some people like! aka preferences) is to show what the style looks like, not to show off a screenshot.

aren’t you being a little harsh, maybe?

also, what’s with the rating if you likely haven’t tried the visual style?

@Man.I / you don’t have a mean bone in you, do you?! i’m pretty much an amatuer mango ;)
@mangosango / it has to be tidy! ..why do you want xp back when you’re doing wonders with w7? you’re crazy.
@audacious / is it that noticeable? i tried to get that as best as i could, which was annoyingly difficult, but i’m happy with it..

all in all, thanks to those that’ve tried it, or will, and can appreciate it in some form!

Newlogo_2011

mangosango wrote:

I don’t have XP anymore, but I wish I did :)
As nitzua said it looks pretty usable and as usual, everything is very neat and clean – maybe a little too clean for my tastes ;)

Avatar

audacious wrote:

@chris: damn man, i mean its simple and some parts im not a huge fan of, but i dont think it deserves moderation…

i’m using it atm on my laptop, works well and is very clean and cheerful. that said: the programs/logoff/shutdown buttons, while interesting, are kinda difficult and pixelated, and some of the corners in general seem rough?

Picture_1

fate0000 wrote:

Looks like a pretty basic minimal theme. It reminds me of the old Nano suite. I won’t rate since I can’t use it.

Messingaround

Man.I [90] wrote:

I’m using this in an XP virtual machine, I think it’s pro. Real solid, and goes nicely with some of Mango’s stuff :D

@ Chris, you have to use the VS first before you can make a reasonable admin assessment bro. It may help you when offering bedroompop pointers if you see something that can make a delicious variation.

Besides, it’s not one of those aesthetically bizarre amiga system shots…

Nos-logo-11

nosphere wrote:

haven’t tried it yet, however it does look good, to me it has an area04 feeling in it, surely deserves testing

14

requestedRerun wrote:

I love your style and it really shows in this

Avatar

akka wrote:

Great colors, and very much your style. Wish the preview showed a little more.

Log in or register to post comments and rate submissions!